Effect of COVID-19 on genomics publications in 2020

COVID-19 was and remains a major crisis in many countries, disrupting general life as well as scientific research. But how has it impacted scientific output in genomics?

To evaluate this I investigated the number of papers published in PubMed Central (PMC) in the period from 2016 through 2020. I used total number of papers as well as those matching the genomics search term with the approach below:

(genom*[Abstract]) AND ("2020"[Publication Date] : "2020"[Publication Date]) 

<Note: the number of papers is only a lagging proxy measure of aggregate activity in a field, it does not relate to scientific quality>

Here are the number of papers and genomics papers published annually over this period.

What you can see is that genomics experienced a major fall in number of papers appearing in PMC in 2020 while total papers did not.




Indeed 2020 was the only year since 2000 that the number of published genomics papers has actually gone down compared to the previous year


There are a lot of ways to predict what amount of output was lost in the genomics field in 2020. We might have expected growth something like the mean year-on-year growth over the past 5 years (7.5%) meaning we should have expected the number of papers to be ~30550. But instead it was -3.6% lower than the year before. This would suggest that the pandemic (and maybe other factors too like funding) have resulted in drop of 11% of scientific output in the field of genomics. 

On the other hand, growth in PMC in 2020 was on par with previous years.

Yes, there are still a few 2020 papers yet to be included in the PMC database but I expect it's only a few hundred and won't impact these findings.

Clearly the pandemic has impacted different fields of study with varying severity, and genomics has taken a big hit. It would be interesting to contrast genomics to other fields like immunology. Looking at smaller timescles would also be interesting.

Let me know your thoughts in the comments below.

Location: Laverton VIC 3028, Australia

Popular posts from this blog

Two subtle problems with over-representation analysis

Image
Over-representation analysis is a helpful and really frequently used technique for understanding trends from omics data and gene lists more generally. Just to demonstrate this, I tabulated the number of citations of some of the most popular web tools and packages, which reaches a massive 191k citations! But if you have used some of these tools, you will notice that they yield subtly different results. We were curiuous about that and ran a whole bunch of investigations into the internal workings of these tools, in particular clusterProfiler. We identified two subtle problems with clusterProfiler, which we unpack in detail in our new publication , but here I will give you a quick overview. Problem #1: The background problem The first one we call the “background problem,” because it involves the software eliminating large numbers of genes from the background list if they are not annotated as belonging to any category. This results in removing a large number of unannotated genes from the b...
Read more

Data analysis step 8: Pathway analysis with GSEA

Image
In our RNA-seq series so far we've performed differential analysis and generated some pretty graphs, showing thousands of differentially expressed genes after azacitidine treatment. In order to understand the biology underlying the differential gene expression profile, we need to perform pathway analysis. We use Gene Set Enrichment Analysis ( GSEA ) because it can detect pathway changes more sensitively and robustly than some methods. A 2013 paper compared a bunch of gene set analyses software with microarrays and is worth a look. Generate a rank file The rank file is a list of detected genes and a rank metric score. At the top of the list are genes with the "strongest" up-regulation, at the bottom of the list are the genes with the "strongest" down-regulation and the genes not changing are in the middle. The metric score I like to use is the sign of the fold change multiplied by the inverse of the p-value, although there may be better methods out there...
Read more

Uploading data to GEO - which method is faster?

If you have had to upload omics data to GEO before, you'll know it's a bit of a hassle and takes a long time. There are a few methods suggested by the GEO team if you are using the Unix command line: Using 'ncftp' ncftp set passive on set so-bufsize 33554432 open  ftp://geoftp:yourpasscode@ftp-private.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov cd uploads/your @mail.com_ yourfolder put -R Folder_with_submission_files Using 'lftp' lftp  ftp://geoftp:yourpasscode@ftp-private.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov cd uploads/ your @mail.com _ yourfolder mirror -R Folder_with_submission_files Using 'sftp' (expect slower transfer speeds since this method encrypts on-the-fly) sftp  geoftp @s ftp-private.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov password: yourpasscode cd uploads/ your @mail.com _ yourfolder mkdir new_geo_submission cd new_geo_submission put file_name Using 'ncftpput' (transfers from the command-line without entering an interactive shell) Usage example: ncftpput -F -R -z -u  geoftp  -p "yourpasscode...
Read more