Bowtie alignment to a genome - single end

Recently I posted about BWA alignment of NGS data, so today I will demonstrate the use of Bowtie2 for aligning single end sequence data, for more information on advanced options, take a thorough look at the manpage. One of major strengths of Bowtie2, is that it's more tolerant for gaps than Bowtie1 and  BWA. Again you will need to have the reference genome and the raw fastq files in the otherwise empty directory.


The first thing we do is stipulate the name of the experiment and the name of the reference sequence.
EXID=Experimentname
REF=Hg19.fa
Now index the genome with bowtie2-build:

bowtie2-build Hg19.fa Hg19.fa
Now to actually start the alignment for all the files with prefix "FC" and suffix "fq":

for FQ in `ls FC*fq | sed 's/.fq//'`
do
bowtie2 -x $REF -U ${FQ}.fq -S ${FQ}.sam -p 4 --met-file ${FQ}.met 2> ${FQ}.stats &
done
wait
The script starts aligning all fq files to the human genome in parallel and each job uses 4 threads as specified by the "-p" option. Alignment output format is sam (not sai like BWA). It also outputs a file containing some alignment metrics as specified by the "--met-file" parameter. Once the sam files are generated, you can follow the SamTools procedure here to convert the data to bam format. You'll also notice that I've redirected the standard error (using "2>") to the stats file, which is generated automatically by bowtie once the alignment is complete. For more info on i/o redirection on Linux, there heaps of good tutorials out there (here, here, here).  Here is an example of what the stats file looks like coming from bowtie2 for an mRNA-seq data set:
20213469 reads; of these:
  20213469 (100.00%) were unpaired; of these:
    1714839 (8.48%) aligned 0 times
    12652875 (62.60%) aligned exactly 1 time
    5845755 (28.92%) aligned >1 times


Location: St Kilda VIC 3182, Australia

Popular posts from this blog

Data analysis step 8: Pathway analysis with GSEA

Image
In our RNA-seq series so far we've performed differential analysis and generated some pretty graphs, showing thousands of differentially expressed genes after azacitidine treatment. In order to understand the biology underlying the differential gene expression profile, we need to perform pathway analysis. We use Gene Set Enrichment Analysis ( GSEA ) because it can detect pathway changes more sensitively and robustly than some methods. A 2013 paper compared a bunch of gene set analyses software with microarrays and is worth a look. Generate a rank file The rank file is a list of detected genes and a rank metric score. At the top of the list are genes with the "strongest" up-regulation, at the bottom of the list are the genes with the "strongest" down-regulation and the genes not changing are in the middle. The metric score I like to use is the sign of the fold change multiplied by the inverse of the p-value, although there may be better methods out there
Read more

Two subtle problems with over-representation analysis

Image
Over-representation analysis is a helpful and really frequently used technique for understanding trends from omics data and gene lists more generally. Just to demonstrate this, I tabulated the number of citations of some of the most popular web tools and packages, which reaches a massive 191k citations! But if you have used some of these tools, you will notice that they yield subtly different results. We were curiuous about that and ran a whole bunch of investigations into the internal workings of these tools, in particular clusterProfiler. We identified two subtle problems with clusterProfiler, which we unpack in detail in our new publication , but here I will give you a quick overview. Problem #1: The background problem The first one we call the “background problem,” because it involves the software eliminating large numbers of genes from the background list if they are not annotated as belonging to any category. This results in removing a large number of unannotated genes from the b
Read more

Uploading data to GEO - which method is faster?

If you have had to upload omics data to GEO before, you'll know it's a bit of a hassle and takes a long time. There are a few methods suggested by the GEO team if you are using the Unix command line: Using 'ncftp' ncftp set passive on set so-bufsize 33554432 open  ftp://geoftp:yourpasscode@ftp-private.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov cd uploads/your @mail.com_ yourfolder put -R Folder_with_submission_files Using 'lftp' lftp  ftp://geoftp:yourpasscode@ftp-private.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov cd uploads/ your @mail.com _ yourfolder mirror -R Folder_with_submission_files Using 'sftp' (expect slower transfer speeds since this method encrypts on-the-fly) sftp  geoftp @s ftp-private.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov password: yourpasscode cd uploads/ your @mail.com _ yourfolder mkdir new_geo_submission cd new_geo_submission put file_name Using 'ncftpput' (transfers from the command-line without entering an interactive shell) Usage example: ncftpput -F -R -z -u  geoftp  -p "yourpasscode"
Read more