Get the newest Reactome gene sets for pathway analysis

For first-pass pathway analysis I find Reactome to be the most useful database of gene sets for biologists to understand. For a long time I have been using Reactome gene sets as deposited to the GSEA/MSigDB website. Recently a colleague pointed me to the gene matrix file offered directly on the Reactome webpage (Thanks Dr Okabe).
The latest Reactome gene set matrix file (gmt) can be found at this link https://reactome.org/download/current/ReactomePathways.gmt.zip 

There are some differences. Firstly there are more gene sets in the one from the Reactome webpage (accessed 2018-05-09)

$ wc -l *gmt
    674 c2.cp.reactome.v6.1.symbols.gmt
   2022 ReactomePathways.gmt
   2696 total

Secondly, there are more genes included in one or more gene sets:

$ cut -f3- c2.cp.reactome.v6.1.symbols.gmt | tr '\t' '\n' | sort -u | wc -l
6025
$ cut -f3- ReactomePathways.gmt | tr '\t' '\n' | sort -u | wc -l
10852

And overall there are about threefold more gene-pathway entries 

$ cut -f3- ReactomePathways.gmt | wc -w
106405
$ cut -f3- c2.cp.reactome.v6.1.symbols.gmt | wc -w
37601

I also looked at whether the gene sets had the same names.

First I counted the names that were common.
$ comm -12 <(cut -f1 ReactomePathways.gmt | tr '[a-z]' '[A-Z]' | tr ' -' '_' | sort ) <(cut -f1 c2.cp.reactome.v6.1.symbols.gmt | tr '[a-z]' '[A-Z]' | tr ' -' '_' | sed 's/REACTOME_//' | sort )  | wc -l
414

Then I counted the names specific to the MSigDB version
$ comm -13 <(cut -f1 ReactomePathways.gmt | tr '[a-z]' '[A-Z]' | tr ' -' '_' | sort ) <(cut -f1 c2.cp.reactome.v6.1.symbols.gmt | tr '[a-z]' '[A-Z]' | tr ' -' '_' | sed 's/REACTOME_//' | sort )  | wc -l
260

Lastly I counted the names specific to the official version
$ comm -23 <(cut -f1 ReactomePathways.gmt | tr '[a-z]' '[A-Z]' | tr ' -' '_' | sort ) <(cut -f1 c2.cp.reactome.v6.1.symbols.gmt | tr '[a-z]' '[A-Z]' | tr ' -' '_' | sed 's/REACTOME_//' | sort )  | wc -l
1608

I have re-run a couple of GSEAs with the official Reactome gene sets and have obtained MUCH better results, so I would recommend to use the official Reactome release for future pathway analyses. It would be great if GSEA/MSigDB team could update their Reactome soon.

Finally, if you include Reactome data in your publications, please cite them so they can continue their awesome work.

Location: Laverton VIC 3028, Australia

Popular posts from this blog

Two subtle problems with over-representation analysis

Image
Over-representation analysis is a helpful and really frequently used technique for understanding trends from omics data and gene lists more generally. Just to demonstrate this, I tabulated the number of citations of some of the most popular web tools and packages, which reaches a massive 191k citations! But if you have used some of these tools, you will notice that they yield subtly different results. We were curiuous about that and ran a whole bunch of investigations into the internal workings of these tools, in particular clusterProfiler. We identified two subtle problems with clusterProfiler, which we unpack in detail in our new publication , but here I will give you a quick overview. Problem #1: The background problem The first one we call the “background problem,” because it involves the software eliminating large numbers of genes from the background list if they are not annotated as belonging to any category. This results in removing a large number of unannotated genes from the b...
Read more

Data analysis step 8: Pathway analysis with GSEA

Image
In our RNA-seq series so far we've performed differential analysis and generated some pretty graphs, showing thousands of differentially expressed genes after azacitidine treatment. In order to understand the biology underlying the differential gene expression profile, we need to perform pathway analysis. We use Gene Set Enrichment Analysis ( GSEA ) because it can detect pathway changes more sensitively and robustly than some methods. A 2013 paper compared a bunch of gene set analyses software with microarrays and is worth a look. Generate a rank file The rank file is a list of detected genes and a rank metric score. At the top of the list are genes with the "strongest" up-regulation, at the bottom of the list are the genes with the "strongest" down-regulation and the genes not changing are in the middle. The metric score I like to use is the sign of the fold change multiplied by the inverse of the p-value, although there may be better methods out there...
Read more

Uploading data to GEO - which method is faster?

If you have had to upload omics data to GEO before, you'll know it's a bit of a hassle and takes a long time. There are a few methods suggested by the GEO team if you are using the Unix command line: Using 'ncftp' ncftp set passive on set so-bufsize 33554432 open  ftp://geoftp:yourpasscode@ftp-private.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov cd uploads/your @mail.com_ yourfolder put -R Folder_with_submission_files Using 'lftp' lftp  ftp://geoftp:yourpasscode@ftp-private.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov cd uploads/ your @mail.com _ yourfolder mirror -R Folder_with_submission_files Using 'sftp' (expect slower transfer speeds since this method encrypts on-the-fly) sftp  geoftp @s ftp-private.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov password: yourpasscode cd uploads/ your @mail.com _ yourfolder mkdir new_geo_submission cd new_geo_submission put file_name Using 'ncftpput' (transfers from the command-line without entering an interactive shell) Usage example: ncftpput -F -R -z -u  geoftp  -p "yourpasscode...
Read more